¼Û°î´åÄÄÀ» ½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö·Î      ¼Û°î´åÄÄÀ» Áñ°Üã±â¿¡ 

| ÇÁ·ÎÇÊ | ¹ø¿ª | Àϱâ | ÆíÁö | Ç¥Çö | È°¿ë | ±âÃâÁö | 2015 | 14(B) | 14(A) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ½Ç¿ë | new | ¼º¹® | Q&A | »çÁø |

| ÁÖÀýÁÖÀý | ÀÚÀ۽à|







  µ¿½ÃÁ¢¼ÓÀÚ:     091
 
ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ : 12/11/19
2013Çг⵵ ¼ö´É ¿Ü±¹¾î ¿µ¿ª 44¹ø Çؼ³
 ±Û¾´ÀÌ : songgok
Á¶È¸ : 6,685  
   2013-44.hwp (76.0K)


2013³â ¼ö´É ¿Ü±¹¾î ¿µ¿ª 44¹ø Á¤´ä ¹× Çؼ³ - ¼Û°î´åÄÄ(songgok.com) 
 
44. ±ÛÀÇ È帧À¸·Î º¸¾Æ ÁÖ¾îÁø ¹®ÀåÀÌ µé¾î°¡±â¿¡ °¡Àå ÀûÀýÇÑ °÷À» °í¸£½Ã¿À.
 
[Despite such evidence of favoritism toward handsome politicians, follow-up research demonstrated that voters did not realize their bias.]
 
Research has shown that we automatically assign to good-looking individuals such favorable traits as talent, kindness, honesty, and intelligence. ( ¨ç ) Furthermore, we make these judgements without being aware that physical attractiveness plays a role in the process. ( ¨è ) Some consequences of this unconscious assumption that ¡°good-looking equals good¡± scare me. ( ¨é ) For example, a study of the 1974 Canadian federal elections found that attractive candidates received more than two and a half times as many votes as unattractive candidates. ( ¨ê ) In fact, 73 percent of Canadian voters surveyed denied in the strongest possible terms that their votes had been influenced by physical appearance; only 14 percent even allowed for the possibility of such influence. ( ¨ë ) Voters can deny the impact of attractiveness on electability all they want, but evidence has continued to confirm its troubling presence.
 
1. ³»¿ëÇ®ÀÌ
ÁÖ¾îÁø ¹®ÀåÀÇ such evidence°¡ ¨ê¹ø ¾Õ ¹®ÀåÀÇ 1974³â ij³ª´Ù ¿¬¹æ ¼±°Å °á°ú¸¦ °¡¸®Å°¹Ç·Î, ÁÖ¾îÁø ¹®ÀåÀº ¨ê¿¡ µé¾î°¡´Â °ÍÀÌ °¡Àå ÀûÀýÇÔ.
 
2. ±¸¹®Çؼ³
¨ç [Research has shown  that / we automatically assign (to good-looking individuals) / such favorable traits as / talent, kindness, honesty, and intelligence.]   ¡ØResearch has shown that~= A study has shown that = according to the research: ¿¬±¸¿¡ µû¸£¸é ¡Øautomatically:¹«ÀǽÄÀûÀ¸·Î ¡Øto good-looking individuals Àß»ý±ä »ç¶÷µé¿¡°Ô ¡Øsuch ~ as: ~¿Í °°Àº ~ ¡Øfavorable traits: ¼±È£ÇÒ ¸¸ÇÑ Æ¯¼ºµé(ÁÁÀº Ư¼ºµé)  ¡ØassignÀÇ ¸ñÀû¾î´Â favorable traitsÀÓ¿¡ À¯ÀÇ ¡æ ¿¬±¸¿¡ µû¸£¸é ¿ì¸®´Â Àç´É, »ó³ÉÇÔ, Á¤Á÷ ±×¸®°í Áö¼º°ú °°Àº ÁÁÀº Ư¼ºµéÀ» Àß»ý±ä »ç¶÷µé¿¡°Ô ¹«ÀǽÄÀûÀ¸·Î ºÎ¿©ÇÑ´Ù´Â °ÍÀÌ ¹àÇôÁ³´Ù.
 
¨è [Furthermore, we make these judgements / without being aware that / physical attractiveness plays a role / in the process.]  ¡Ømake a judgement: ÆÇ´ÜÇÏ´Ù ¡Øbe aware of(that):~À» ¾Ë´Ù, ÀνÄÇÏ´Ù ¡Ø play a role = play a part: ¿ªÇÒÀ» ÇÏ´Ù   ¡æ ´õ±º´Ù³ª, ¿ì¸®´Â ½ÅüÀûÀÎ ¸Å·ÂÀÌ ±×·¯ÇÑ °úÁ¤¿¡ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ´ã´çÇÑ´Ù´Â ÀÎ½Ä ¾øÀÌ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÆÇ´ÜÀ» ÇÑ´Ù.
 
¨é [Some consequences / of this unconscious assumption / that ¡°good-looking equals good¡± / scare me.]  ¡ØÁÖ¾î´Â Some consequences: ÀϺΠ¿µÇâ·Âµé(¸î¸î °á°úµé), µ¿»ç´Â scare: µÎ·Æ°Ô ÇÏ´Ù ¡Øunconscious assumption:¹«ÀǽÄÀûÀÎ °¡Á¤   ¡æ¡°Àß»ý±ä °ÍÀÌ ÁÁÀº °ÍÀÌ´Ù.¡±¶ó´Â ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹«ÀǽÄÀûÀÎ °¡Á¤ÀÇ ÀϺΠ¿µÇâ·ÂµéÀº ³ª¸¦ µÎ·Æ°Ô ÇÑ´Ù.
 
¨ê [For example, a study (of the 1974 Canadian federal elections) / found / that attractive candidates / received / more than two and a half times / as many votes as unattractive candidates.]   ¡Øfederal election:¿¬¹æ¼±°Å  ¡Ømore than two and a half times: µÎ¹è ¹Ý ÀÌ»ó  ¡Ø¹è¼ö»ç as + ¸í»ç/Çü¿ë»ç/ºÎ»ç + as Ç¥ÇöÀÓ¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇϼ¼¿ä     ¡æ ¿¹¸¦ µé¾î, 1974³â ij³ª´Ù ¿¬¹æ ¼±°Å¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ¸Å·ÂÀûÀÎ Èĺ¸ÀÚµéÀÌ ¸Å·ÂÀûÀÌÁö ¾ÊÀº Èĺ¸Àڵ麸´Ù µÎ ¹è ¹Ý ÀÌ»óÀÇ µæÇ¥¸¦ Çß´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» º¸¿©ÁÖ¾ú´Ù.
 
¨ë [Despite such evidence of favoritism / toward handsome politicians, / follow-up research demonstrated that voters did not realize their bias.] ¡Ødespite = in spite of: ~¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í ¡Øfollow-up research:À̾îÁø ¿¬±¸´Â ¡æ Àß»ý±ä Á¤Ä¡ÀεéÀ» ÇâÇÑ Ä¡¿ìÄ£ ¾ÖÁ¤¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±×¿Í °°Àº Áõ°Å¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í, ÈÄ¼Ó ¿¬±¸´Â À¯±ÇÀÚµéÀÌ ÀڽŵéÀÇ Æí°ßÀ» ±ú´ÝÁö ¸øÇß´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» º¸¿©ÁÖ¾ú´Ù.
 
¨ì [In fact, 73 percent of Canadian voters (who were) surveyed / denied (in the strongest possible terms) that their votes had been influenced by physical appearance; only 14 percent even allowed for the possibility of such influence.]
 
¡Øin the strongest possible terms: °¡Àå °­·ÂÇÑ ¸»Åõ·Î ¡Øhad been influenced: °ú°Å¿Ï·á ¼öµ¿ÅÂÀÓ¿¡ ÁÖÀÇ ¡Øtheir votes had been influenced by physical appearance = Physical had influenced their votes. ¡Øthe possibility of such influence: ±×·¯ÇÑ ¿µÇâÀÇ °¡´É¼º   ¡æ»ç½Ç, Á¶»ç¿¡ Âü¿©ÇÑ Ä³³ª´Ù À¯±ÇÀÚµé Áß 73ÆÛ¼¾Æ®°¡ ÀڽŵéÀÇ ÅõÇ¥°¡ ½ÅüÀûÀÎ ¿Ü¸ð¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹Þ¾Ò´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» °¡´ÉÇÑ ÇÑ °¡Àå °­·ÂÇÑ ¾îÁ¶·Î ºÎÀÎÇßÀ¸¸ç, 14ÆÛ¼¾Æ®¸¸ÀÌ ±×·¯ÇÑ ¿µÇâÀÇ °¡´É¼ºÀ» ÀÎÁ¤ÇÒ Á¤µµ¿´´Ù.
 
¨í [Voters can deny the impact of attractiveness / on electability / all (that)¡¡they want, but evidence has continued to confirm its troubling presence.]  ¡Øthe impact of attractiveness:(½ÅüÀûÀÎ)¸Å·ÂÀÇ ¿µÇâ·Â  ¡Øon electability:¼±Ãâ °¡´É¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¡Øall (that)¡¡they want£º±×µéÀÌ ¿øÇÏ´Â ¸¸Å­ ¡Øits troubling presence:±×°ÍÀÇ ¼º°¡½Å Á¸Àç(its = the impact of attractiveness)   ¡æÀ¯±ÇÀÚµéÀº (½ÅüÀûÀÎ) ¸Å·ÂÀÌ ¼±ÃâµÉ °¡´É¼º¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ·ÂÀ» ÀڽŵéÀÌ ¿øÇÏ´Â ¸¸Å­ ¸¶À½²¯ ºÎÀÎÇÒ ¼ö´Â ÀÖ°ÚÁö¸¸, °è¼ÓµÇ´Â Áõ°Å°¡ ±×°ÍÀÇ ¼º°¡½Å Á¸À縦 È®ÀÎÇØ ¿Ô´Ù.
 
3. ´Ü¾îÁ¤¸®
*Despite = in spite of ~¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í *evidence Áõ°Å *favoritism Ä¡¿ìÄ£ »ç¶û, Æí¾Ö *follow-up µÚµû¸£´Â, °è¼ÓÇÏ´Â *demonstrate Áõ¸íÇÏ´Ù, ³íÁõÇÏ´Ù, ³ªÅ¸³»´Ù *bias Æí°ß, ¼±ÀÔ°ü, ÇÑÂÊÀ¸·Î Ä¡¿ìÄ¡´Ù *assign ºÎ¿©ÇÏ´Ù, ÇÒ´çÇÏ´Ù *trait Ư¼º, Ư»ö, Ư¡, ¸ð½À *be aware of(that): ~À» ¾Ë´Ù, ÀνÄÇÏ´Ù *attractiveness ¸Å·Â, ¸ÅȤ * unconscious ¹«ÀǽÄÀûÀÎ(¡êconscious ÀǽÄÀûÀÎ) *assumption °¡Á¤, °¡¼³ *federal election ¿¬¹æ ¼±°Å *candidate Èĺ¸ÀÚ *consequence ¿µÇâ(·Â), °á°ú *survey Á¶»çÇÏ´Ù *term ¸»Åõ, ¸»¾¾, ±â°£, ÀÓ±â *appearance ¿Ü¸ð, °Ñº¸±â *electability ¼±Ãâ °¡´É¼º *confirm È®ÀÎÇÏ´Ù, È®½ÇÀÌ ÇÏ´Ù cf) conform ¼øÀÀ½ÃÅ°´Ù, ¼øÀÀÇÏ´Ù, reform °³ÇõÇÏ´Ù *presence Á¸Àç
 
4. Àü¹®Çؼ®
¿¬±¸¿¡ µû¸£¸é ¿ì¸®´Â Àç´É, »ó³ÉÇÔ, Á¤Á÷ ±×¸®°í Áö¼º°ú °°Àº ÁÁÀº Ư¼ºµéÀ» Àß»ý±ä »ç¶÷µé¿¡°Ô ¹«ÀǽÄÀûÀ¸·Î ºÎ¿©ÇÑ´Ù´Â °ÍÀÌ ¹àÇôÁ³´Ù. ´õ±º´Ù³ª, ¿ì¸®´Â ½ÅüÀûÀÎ ¸Å·ÂÀÌ ±×·¯ÇÑ °úÁ¤¿¡ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ´ã´çÇÑ´Ù´Â ÀÎ½Ä ¾øÀÌ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÆÇ´ÜÀ» ÇÑ´Ù. ¡°Àß»ý±ä °ÍÀÌ ÁÁÀº °ÍÀÌ´Ù.¡±¶ó´Â ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹«ÀǽÄÀûÀÎ °¡Á¤ÀÇ ÀϺΠ¿µÇâ·ÂµéÀº ³ª¸¦ µÎ·Æ°Ô ÇÑ´Ù. ¿¹¸¦ µé¾î, 1974³â ij³ª´Ù ¿¬¹æ ¼±°Å¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ¸Å·ÂÀûÀÎ Èĺ¸ÀÚµéÀÌ ¸Å·ÂÀûÀÌÁö ¾ÊÀº Èĺ¸Àڵ麸´Ù µÎ ¹è ¹Ý ÀÌ»óÀÇ µæÇ¥¸¦ Çß´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» º¸¿©ÁÖ¾ú´Ù. Àß»ý±ä Á¤Ä¡ÀεéÀ» ÇâÇÑ Ä¡¿ìÄ£ ¾ÖÁ¤¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±×¿Í °°Àº Áõ°Å¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í, ÈÄ¼Ó ¿¬±¸´Â À¯±ÇÀÚµéÀÌ ÀڽŵéÀÇ Æí°ßÀ» ±ú´ÝÁö ¸øÇß´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» º¸¿©ÁÖ¾ú´Ù. »ç½Ç, Á¶»ç¿¡ Âü¿©ÇÑ Ä³³ª´Ù À¯±ÇÀÚµé Áß 73ÆÛ¼¾Æ®°¡ ÀڽŵéÀÇ ÅõÇ¥°¡ ½ÅüÀûÀÎ ¿Ü¸ð¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹Þ¾Ò´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» °¡´ÉÇÑ ÇÑ °¡Àå °­·ÂÇÑ ¾îÁ¶·Î ºÎÀÎÇßÀ¸¸ç, 14ÆÛ¼¾Æ®¸¸ÀÌ ±×·¯ÇÑ ¿µÇâÀÇ °¡´É¼ºÀ» ÀÎÁ¤ÇÒ Á¤µµ¿´´Ù. À¯±ÇÀÚµéÀº (½ÅüÀûÀÎ) ¸Å·ÂÀÌ ¼±ÃâµÉ °¡´É¼º¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ·ÂÀ» ÀڽŵéÀÌ ¿øÇÏ´Â ¸¸Å­ ¸¶À½²¯ ºÎÀÎÇÒ ¼ö´Â ÀÖ°ÚÁö¸¸, °è¼ÓµÇ´Â Áõ°Å°¡ ±×°ÍÀÇ ¼º°¡½Å Á¸À縦 È®ÀÎÇØ ¿Ô´Ù.
 
¼Û°î´åÄÄ(songgok.com) - ¼Õ¹ü½Ä
 
   
 

Copyright ¨Ï 1998, songgok.com by Bum-Sik Son. update 2011, All rights reserved.